Content on this page:
Content on this page:
Evaluation
Clinical
Evaluation
A reasonable clinical
suspicion (ie patient with VTE risk
factors and prior history of DVT) is required to avoid missing the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Evaluating
the likelihood of pulmonary embolism in an individual patient according to the
clinical presentation is of utmost importance in the interpretation of
diagnostic test results and the selection of an appropriate diagnostic strategy.
A rapid diagnosis should be done with a CTPA or perfusion scan. A bedside transthoracic echocardiogram may be done in patients who are
hemodynamically unstable to differentiate suspected high-risk pulmonary
embolism from other acute life-threatening conditions. Patients should also be
evaluated for risk factors for VTE.
It is recommended to perform initial risk stratification in
hemodynamically unstable patients with suspected or confirmed pulmonary
embolism to identify those with a high risk of early mortality. Acute pulmonary
embolism severity may be stratified using validated scores from combined
clinical, laboratory, and imaging prognostic factors in patients who are
hemodynamically stable. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) identifies
the patient's overall mortality risk using pulmonary embolism severity and
comorbidity. It may be used to evaluate if the patient is appropriate for outpatient
therapy. A score of ≥1 indicates a 30-day mortality risk of 10.9% in the
simplified version of PESI (sPESI) and should be considered for initial inpatient therapy.
Absolute Contraindications to
Thrombolysis
The following are absolute contraindications to thrombolysis:
- Hemorrhagic stroke or stroke of unknown origin at any time (including intracerebral hemorrhage)
- Major trauma, surgery, or head injury in the past 3 months
- Ischemic stroke within the past 6 months
- Central nervous system (CNS) damage or tumors, intracranial vascular lesions
- Severe coagulation disorders
- Active major bleeding
- Known increased risk for bleeding (severe bleeding diathesis)
- Suspected aortic dissection
Relative
Contraindications to Thrombolysis
The following are relative contraindications to thrombolysis:
- Transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months
- Puncture of a non-compressible vessel
- Uncontrolled severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure of >180 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure [DBP] of >100 mmHg)
- Neurosurgery or ophthalmologic surgery within the last 1 month
- Ischemic stroke within the last 2 months
- Gastrointestinal bleeding within the last 10 days
- Active peptic ulcer disease
- Recent traumatic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
- Pregnancy or within 1 week postpartum
- Infective endocarditis
- Oral anticoagulant therapy
- Advanced liver disease
Prompt Management of
Clinical Instability
Hemodynamically unstable patients with pulmonary
embolism may present with an SBP <90 mmHg for 15 minutes (requiring
vasopressors) or over shock and with increased risk for right heart failure and
death.
O2 Supplementation
O2 supplementation may be necessary in patients
with hypoxemia. Hypoxemia can usually be reversed with nasal O2 so
mechanical ventilation is rarely necessary.
Mechanical Ventilation
Mechanical ventilation may be needed temporarily in
patients who appear toxic and hypoxic. Care should be taken to limit its
hemodynamic adverse effects. Positive intrathoracic pressures induced by
mechanical ventilation may reduce venous return and worsen RV failure. Low tidal volumes of approximately 6 mL/kg body weight are recommended.
Hemodynamic Support
Fluid Loading
Fluids may be administered initially and cautiously,
but other vasoactive therapies should promptly follow. The usefulness of fluid
challenge is controversial and should not exceed 500 mL over 15 to 30 minutes.
It may be harmful when systemic hypotension is present.
Adrenergic Agonists
Adrenergic agonists should be considered for
patients with low cardiac index and normal blood pressure or with impending
hypotension. In high-risk pulmonary embolism patients, Dobutamine and/or
Norepinephrine should be considered.
Please
see Adrenergic Agonists
under Pharmacological
Therapy: Prompt Management of Clinical Instability
for further information.
Nitric Oxide Inhalation
Nitric oxide inhalation may be indicated in patients with pulmonary
hypertension and a patent foramen ovale. It may improve the hemodynamic status and
gas exchange in patients with pulmonary embolism.
Principles of Therapy
All patients with acute VTE should undergo a
bleeding risk assessment before starting anticoagulation therapy. The decision
to start empirical anticoagulation while awaiting diagnostic confirmation
should be guided by the level of clinical suspicion for VTE, the anticipated
timing of tests results, and the patient’s risk of bleeding.
Phases of Anticoagulation
in DVT
The initial treatment phase is up to 10 days with
the aim of rapidly initiating anticoagulation after a diagnosis of VTE to
prevent the progression of DVT
and pulmonary embolism. Delay in DVT treatment may result in loss of the
patient’s limb, circulatory collapse, shock or death.
The principal treatment phase is
during the first 3 months to maintain therapeutic levels
of anticoagulation to prevent DVT
progression and pulmonary embolism and reduce the risk of early recurrent VTE. Anticoagulation for 3 months
is recommended in patients with provoked proximal DVT with a major transient risk
factor. Interruptions in anticoagulation should be minimized
during the first 3 months due to the high risk of recurrent thrombosis.
The extended treatment phase is after 3 months of
primary treatment is given to reduce the long-term risk of recurrent VTE. It is recommended for patients
with second or subsequent unprovoked DVT.
Extended anticoagulation is recommended in patients with a medium risk of
recurrence which includes patients with recurrent VTE, unprovoked event, minor, soft
transient risk factors (eg travel), obesity, HF, COPD, and male gender. Indefinite
anticoagulation is recommended in patients with a high risk of recurrence
unless the patient is with a high risk of bleeding, including patients with
active cancer or persistent major risk factors (eg rheumatic disorder, severe
thrombophilia).
General Therapy Principles Regarding Anticoagulant Therapy
Immediate therapeutic anticoagulation should be given in the first 24
hours as the recurrence rate for venous thromboembolism is higher if
anticoagulation is non-therapeutic. Factors affecting choice of
anticoagulant include hemodynamic stability, comorbidities, prior history of
renal impairment and HIT, bleeding risk, anticipated need for discontinuation,
patient preference and cost.
For patients with DVT or pulmonary
embolism, the primary treatment of 3 months duration is recommended:
- Proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism provoked by major surgery or trauma that is transient: Treatment is stopped after 3 months
- Proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism which is unprovoked or associated with a non-surgical transient risk factor: Treat for 3-6 months
- Proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism which is recurrent unprovoked, provoked by active cancer or antiphospholipid antibody syndrome or by a chronic risk factor: Treat with extended anticoagulation
- Distal DVT provoked by a transient risk factor: Treat for 6 weeks
- Distal DVT which is unprovoked or with persisting risk factors: Treatment is stopped after 3 months
General Therapy Principles
Regarding Heparin
Anticoagulation should be administered without delay
in patients with intermediate or high clinical probability of pulmonary
embolism during diagnostic workup and in low probability patients once
pulmonary embolism is confirmed.
If pulmonary embolism occurs postoperatively,
Heparin therapy should be started after consultation with the surgeon and at
12-24 hours after major surgery. Treatment could be delayed even longer if
there is any evidence of bleeding from the surgical site.
Similar initial and long-term treatment is
recommended for asymptomatic DVT. Protamine sulfate may be used for the
reversal of anticoagulation.
Criteria for Appropriate Setting
for DVT Management
- Outpatient: Stable hemodynamic and clinical status, low bleeding risk, absence of severe renal function impairment, adequate home support for anticoagulation therapy, and monitoring for DVT and bleeding complications
- Inpatient: Massive DVT, high risk of bleeding on anticoagulation and comorbid conditions (eg concurrent pulmonary embolism)
Criteria
for Outpatient Pulmonary Embolism Management
- No O2 or narcotic requirement
- No respiratory distress
- No recent history of or risk factors for bleeding
- No serious comorbid conditions
- No concurrent DVT
- No needle aversion if low-molecular-weight Heparin (LMWH) is chosen
- Normal pulse, BP, and mental status
- Ready access to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs)
- Low risk of death on PESI or sPESI
- Have good home support and reliable hospital access
Thrombus Removal
Early thrombus removal strategies may be considered
in patients with symptomatic iliofemoral DVT.
Thrombolysis in Massive or
Sub-Massive Pulmonary Embolism
High-risk pulmonary embolism patients are
recommended to receive systemic thrombolytic therapy. Patients with hemodynamic
deterioration on anticoagulation therapy are recommended to undergo rescue
thrombolytic treatment. Studies have shown a more rapid improvement in
radiographic and hemodynamic abnormalities in acute massive pulmonary embolism
patients who received thrombolytic agents followed by anticoagulant agents over
conventional anticoagulant agents alone. There were no clinically relevant
outcomes for death rate or for the resolution of symptoms.
Treatment
started within 48 hours of symptom onset provides the most benefit, though
thrombolysis can still be used in those who are symptomatic for 6-14 days. Catheter-directed
thrombolytic therapy may also be considered in patients with massive
iliofemoral DVT (weigh risk versus benefit) or
spontaneous proximal upper extremity thrombosis with symptoms of <14 days,
limb-threatening DVT (phlegmasia cerulea dolens),
good functional status, low risk of bleeding, and ≥1-year life expectancy.
Massive Pulmonary Embolism
The use of thrombolytic therapy in pulmonary
embolism should be individualized. Patients with hemodynamically unstable pulmonary
embolism who are at low risk of bleeding are the most appropriate candidates.
Thrombolytic
therapy may also be considered in patients with compromised oxygenation or
worsening right HF; pre-resuscitation cardiopulmonary arrest; free-floating RV thrombus or patent foramen ovale
documented by echocardiography; and massive hemodynamically significant pulmonary
embolism without systemic hypotension or profound hypoxemia.
Sub-massive Pulmonary Embolism
The use of thrombolytics in patients with
sub-massive pulmonary embolism (hemodynamically stable patients with echocardiographic
and/or biomarker evidence of RV dysfunction) is controversial.
Further studies are needed to show a clinically relevant improvement in the
benefit-risk ratio of thrombolytic treatment over traditional anticoagulant
therapy in these patients.
Thrombolysis may be reasonably considered in select
younger patients with sub-massive pulmonary embolism at low bleeding risk or
for those with high decompensation risk because of concomitant cardiopulmonary
disease.
Please
see Thrombolytic Agents
under Pharmacological Therapy: Thrombolysis
in Massive or Sub-massive Pulmonary Embolism
for further information.
Pharmacological therapy
Oral Anticoagulants in the Management of DVT and
Non-massive Pulmonary Embolism
NOACs
Example
drugs: Apixaban, Dabigatran, Edoxaban, Rivaroxaban
NOACs are also known as direct oral anticoagulants
(DOACs). They are the recommended anticoagulant agents for patients with leg DVT or pulmonary embolism during
the first 3 months of therapy. They are preferred over vitamin K antagonists in
eligible pulmonary embolism patients for the acute-phase treatment of low- or
intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism.
Drug interactions are few, bleeding risk is low, and
routine monitoring is not required. Studies suggest that NOACs have a safety
advantage over conventional therapy for VTE
treatment in Asian patients. They may be given to patients with renal
impairment or active cancer. They may also be a treatment option for VTE in patients with brain
tumor.
Apixaban and Rivaroxaban are given according to the
single-drug approach (monotherapy) while Dabigatran and Edoxaban should be
given after initial treatment with Heparin (dual therapy). Standard doses of
Apixaban and Rivaroxaban may be considered in obese patients for VTE prophylaxis and treatment. For
the reversal of anticoagulation, Idarucizumab may be used for patients taking
Dabigatran while Andexanet alfa may be used for patients taking Apixaban or
Rivaroxaban. Ciraparantag is an investigational agent that can bind and inhibit
factor Xa inhibitors, UFH, LMWH, and Fondaparinux.
Apixaban
When Apixaban is given, prior Heparin treatment is
not necessary, though short courses of Heparin should be given when there is a
treatment delay. Apixaban is considered an alternative agent to LMWH for
patients with cancer-associated thrombosis without high risk for
gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding. It is preferred for patients with
coronary artery disease, dyspepsia, or history of gastrointestinal bleeding. It
may be used in patients with end-stage renal disease without dose adjustment.
Dabigatran etexilate
Dabigatran etexilate is approved for the management
of DVT and pulmonary embolism
in patients who have been treated with parenteral anticoagulant for 5-10 days,
and to reduce the risk of recurrent DVT
and pulmonary embolism in patients who have been previously treated.
Edoxaban
Edoxaban may be used for the treatment of DVT and pulmonary embolism in
patients who have been treated with parenteral anticoagulant for 5-10 days. It
is preferred for patients with coronary artery disease. It is considered an
alternative agent to LMWH for pulmonary embolism patients with cancer (except
gastrointestinal cancer).
Rivaroxaban
Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that is
non-inferior to Warfarin in the management of acute VTE. It is an initial treatment for
both pulmonary embolism and DVT
without additional anticoagulation. It is preferred for patients with coronary
artery disease. It is considered an alternative agent to LMWH for pulmonary
embolism patients with cancer (except gastrointestinal cancer).
Warfarin
Warfarin is a vitamin K antagonist and is used to
reduce the risk of VTE
recurrence and complications. It should only be started once VTE has been reliably confirmed. It
is started on day 1 of Heparin therapy.
Bolus dose is not effective; therefore, it requires
at least 5 days to achieve its full effects. Thus, it is recommended that
Warfarin therapy overlap with parenteral anticoagulation (eg Heparin) for at
least 5 days until therapeutic INR is stable and >2.0 (range: 2.0-3.0) in 2
consecutive readings.
A high-loading dose
(>10 mg) of Warfarin is not recommended as it has no clinical use, and it
predisposes patients to hemorrhage at the start of therapy. Overdose may be
reversed with vitamin K administration, 4-factor prothrombin complex
concentrate, or fresh frozen plasma.
Warfarin overlapping with UFH, LMWH, or dose-reduced
Enoxaparin may be considered in patients with severe renal impairment,
established renal failure or increased risk of bleeding. A vitamin K antagonist
is preferred for patients with coronary artery disease or history of
gastrointestinal bleeding. Warfarin may be used as an alternative in patients
where there are concerns about the limited availability of reversal agents.
Patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome are recommended to undergo
indefinite vitamin K antagonist treatment.
Parenteral Anticoagulants
in the Management of DVT and Non-massive Pulmonary Embolism
LMWH and Unfractionated Heparin
(UFH)
Both subcutaneous LMWH and intravenous UFH short-course
treatments are recommended for objectively confirmed non-massive pulmonary
embolism. Either LMWH or UFH is appropriate for the initial treatment of pulmonary
embolism. It is not recommended to give UFH or LMWH monotherapy in patients with
severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl] of <30 mL/min).
LMWH
LMWH should be used whenever
possible for the initial inpatient treatment of DVT rather than UFH. LMWH is
superior to UFH for the initial treatment of DVT in reducing mortality and the
risk of major bleeding during initial therapy.
LMWH is preferred over UFH in patients with acute
non-massive pulmonary embolism and it is also preferred over vitamin K
antagonists. LMWH or Fondaparinux is recommended over UFH for the acute-phase
treatment of low- or intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism.
It may be a treatment option for VTE in patients with brain tumors.
It is also used for the initial management of patients with phlegmasia cerulea
dolens delivered in combination with aggressive leg elevation and fluid
resuscitation. Weight-based LMWH dose is recommended for obese patients with
acute VTE.
Patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism should
initially be treated in the hospital because of decreased cardiorespiratory
reserve, complications, and for monitoring of International Normalized Ratio
(INR) to guide Warfarin therapy. The use of LMWH is safe and effective and may
shorten hospital stay and improve the quality of life for patients. Monotherapy
with LMWH may be used in patients with active cancer or established renal
failure and considered in patients with liver disease and coagulopathy, and in
pregnancy. It may also be given concurrently with a vitamin K antagonist for
patients with active cancer or antiphospholipid syndrome. Outpatient management
of DVT should be extended to
include stable patients with stable pulmonary embolism who have been carefully
screened for risk factors for hemorrhage. Laboratory
monitoring is not required except for a regular platelet count before treatment
initiation and on the fifth day, then every 2-3 days if LMWH treatment is
continued.
UFH
Intravenous UFH treatment in pulmonary embolism is
well-established. UFH should be considered as a first-dose bolus; for massive
or sub-massive pulmonary embolism; without delay in suspected high-risk pulmonary
embolism patients with hemodynamic instability; and when rapid reversal of
effect may be required.
It may also be given to patients with obesity
or poor absorption (eg anasarca, massive edema), high bleeding risks,
receiving thrombolysis, or undergoing invasive procedures. It is used for the initial
management of patients with phlegmasia cerulea dolens delivered in combination
with aggressive leg elevation and fluid resuscitation. Patients with confirmed pulmonary
embolism and hemodynamic instability may be given continuous UFH infusion with
thrombolytic therapy. UFH is preferred over LMWH in patients with severe renal
failure.
Intravenous UFH has been proven effective in the
therapy of pulmonary embolism and DVT.
Studies have shown a reduced mortality rate when UFH has been used to treat VTE disease. The recurrence of VTE is unusual when UFH is infused
at a rate that prolongs the aPTT >1.5-2.5 times the control value and when
adequate levels are reached within 24 hours.
Intravenous UFH typically requires hospitalization with
close laboratory monitoring and dose adjustment. The most common complication
is HIT.
Fondaparinux
Fondaparinux, a selective inhibitor of activated
factor X (Xa), is also a preferred initial treatment for DVT and pulmonary embolism. It
may be used as an alternative to Heparin in patients with HIT. Heparin
assay (anti-factor Xa) has been used to monitor the effects of Fondaparinux. Warfarin
is initiated usually within 72 hours of therapy. A platelet count should be
obtained prior to the start of therapy.
Duration of Therapy
Treatment with LMWH, UFH or
Fondaparinux should be continued for at least 5-7 days after the initiation of
Warfarin and until therapeutic INR is stable and ≥2.0 (range: 2.0 to 3.0) for 2
consecutive days.
Prompt
Management of Clinical Instability
Adrenergic Agonists
Dobutamine
Dobutamine is considered a first-line agent to treat
right-sided HF and cardiogenic shock. It affects vasodilatation of
both systemic and pulmonary vascular beds and increases myocardial
contractility while decreasing right-sided filling pressures.
Dopamine
Dopamine has also been used for hemodynamic support
in pulmonary embolism patients. Its use may be limited by the development of
tachycardia.
Epinephrine
Epinephrine may be effective when shock complicates
acute pulmonary embolism. Its vasoconstrictor effect is similar to
Norepinephrine. Its inotropic effect is more due to potent β1
stimulation rather than the β2 effect, accounting for improved
pulmonary vascular resistance.
Norepinephrine
Norepinephrine may be appropriate in acute massive pulmonary
embolism when there is profound hypertension (eg cardiogenic shock).
Norepinephrine stimulates both α-adrenergic (inducing vasoconstriction) and β1-adrenergic
receptors (augmenting cardiac contractility) resulting in improved systemic blood
pressure, cardiac output, pulmonary vascular resistance, and RV pressure. A combination with other vasoactive agents (eg Dobutamine) needs
further evaluation.
Thrombolysis in Massive or
Sub-Massive Pulmonary Embolism
Thrombolytic
Agents
Alteplase (Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator [rt-PA])
Alteplase has comparable thrombolytic capacity to
Streptokinase and Urokinase but can be administered for a shorter duration (2
hours). It is the preferred thrombolytic agent because of its shorter
administration time.
Streptokinase or Urokinase
Streptokinase and Urokinase have similar
thrombolytic effects in pulmonary embolism and have been shown to resolve pulmonary
embolism comparatively at 24 hours and 3x that as seen with Heparin alone. 12
hours of Urokinase has equivalent thrombolytic efficacy to 24 hours of
Streptokinase.

Nonpharmacological
Patient Education
Educate patients and their families about DVT or pulmonary embolism, especially its signs and symptoms, risk of
recurrence of disease, risk of long-term disability, and the possibility of
genetic predisposition. Explain the treatment options to patients and discuss
the benefits, risks, and side effects of anticoagulation therapy. Discuss
lifestyle issues with patients and advise patients to drink plenty of fluids. The
lay public may not be familiar with pulmonary embolism and discussing it may
assuage their emotional burden.
Bed Rest and Leg Elevation
The affected extremity should be elevated above the
level of the heart until edema and tenderness subside.
Early Ambulation
Early ambulation is preferred over bed rest when
feasible in patients with acute DVT.
Exercise
Encourage patients confined to a chair or bed to
perform regular leg exercises.
Graduated Elastic Compression
Stockings (GECS)
Graduated elastic compression stockings provide
continuous stimulation of blood flow and prevent dilation of the venous system
in the legs. It counteracts increased venous pressure and improves venous flow
leading to the reduction of edema and optimal calf muscle function.
Graduated elastic
compression stockings combined with early ambulation do not increase the
chances of developing pulmonary embolism and provide faster resolution of pain and
swelling. It is recommended to start at 1 month of diagnosis of proximal DVT until a minimum of 2 years to prevent postthrombotic syndrome. Graduated
compression, knee-high, custom-fitted stockings with at least 30 to 40 mmHg on
the affected leg may be used. Use may be limited to 6-12 months in patients
with proximal DVT and with limited signs and symptoms.

It should be used with caution in patients with postthrombotic syndrome. It is contraindicated in patients with peripheral artery disease or severe CHF. Some studies show the ineffectiveness of graduated elastic compression stockings for prophylaxis and they also cause lower extremity skin damage; thus, routine use of compression stockings is not recommended in patients with DVT, with or without an increased risk of postthrombotic syndrome. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices are considered more effective than GECS alone, especially following orthopedic surgery.
Surgery
Invasive Procedures
In patients with cardiac arrest or refractory
circulatory collapse, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be considered
in combination with a catheter-directed treatment or surgical embolectomy.
Catheter Extraction
Catheter extraction involves the suction extraction
of pulmonary embolism under fluoroscopy with ECG monitoring. This approach
should be reserved for highly compromised patients who cannot receive
thrombolytic therapy or whose status is so critical that it does not allow time
to infuse thrombolytic therapy.
Pulmonary Embolectomy
Pulmonary embolectomy is performed in emergency situations when more conservative measures have failed. It should be reserved for the following patients:
- Massive pulmonary embolism (preferably angiographically documented)
- Hemodynamic instability despite Heparin and resuscitation
- High-risk pulmonary embolism or hemodynamically deteriorating patients with failure of thrombolytic therapy or contraindication to its use
Thrombectomy
Percutaneous Venous Thrombectomy
Patients with acute DVT should not
be treated with percutaneous thrombectomy alone.
Surgical Venous Thrombectomy
Surgical venous thrombectomy reduces acute symptoms and
postthrombotic morbidity in patients with acute iliofemoral DVT. These patients have extensive venous thrombosis and have
contraindications for anticoagulation and thrombolytic therapy.
Vena Caval Interruption
Inferior Vena Caval (IVC)
Filters
Inferior
vena caval filters should be considered in DVT or pulmonary embolism patients
with failure, contraindication or complication of anticoagulant therapy and in patients with
large, free-floating iliocaval thrombus, with a proximal DVT that
developed during surveillance or with a pulmonary embolism that developed during
anticoagulation therapy. Contraindications to
anticoagulation are reassessed and once mitigated, initiation of
anticoagulation is attempted. If successful, anticoagulation is administered
for at least 3 months and evaluation for removal of IVC filter is done (usually
4 weeks after initiation of anticoagulation). Consider removing the inferior vena caval filter if
anticoagulation has been established and is no longer contraindicated.
Inferior vena caval may also be considered in
patients who suffer from recurrent VTE despite adequate
anticoagulant therapy and patients with chronic recurrent embolism with pulmonary
hypertension. It may be indicated after surgical embolectomy or pulmonary
thromboendarterectomy.
It is preferable in patients with proximal DVT with active hemorrhage, platelet count <50,000 x 109/L,
or previous intracerebral hemorrhage. It should
not be used routinely in patients with DVT who are also being treated with anticoagulants.