Helicobacter pylori Infection Diagnostics

Last updated: 14 December 2025

Content on this page:

Content on this page:

Laboratory Tests and Ancillaries

Helicobacter pylori Infection_DiagnosticsHelicobacter pylori Infection_Diagnostics





METHODS OF H PYLORI TESTING
MODALITY ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Noninvasive
Urea breath test (UBT)
  • Highly specific and sensitive
  • Reliable, inexpensive, rapid, quantitative
  • Gold standard test for asymptomatic patients
  • Most valuable for assessing response to therapy after 4-8 weeks
  • Useful for eradication confirmation
  • Rarely with false-positive results due to urease-positive organisms
  • Provides no information about antibiotic resistance
  • Requires withholding of some medications prior to testing
Stool antigen test
  • Highly specific and sensitive
  • Rapid, simple and can be modified
  • Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the most accurate
  • Requires withholding of some medications prior to testing
Serology
  • Rapid, quantitative, inexpensive
  • May be used to rule out H pylori infection
  • Not affected by gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Not affected by antibiotic or PPI use
  • Low sensitivity and specificity
  • Not for successful eradication confirmation
  • Does not distinguish between active and past infection
Invasive
Endoscopy with biopsy and rapid urease test (RUT)

Endoscopy:

  • Permits inspection of pathology
  • Allows detection of ulcers, neoplasm
  • Allows detection of bleeding

RUT:

  • Highly sensitive and specific
  • Rapid
  • Inexpensive
  • Easy-to-use test in a clinical setting

Endoscopy:

  • Invasive, expensive
  • Unable to visualize H pylori

RUT:

  • Requires withholding of some medications prior to testing
Culture
  • Highly specific
  • Permits determination of antimicrobial susceptibility
  • Low sensitivity
  • Expensive
  • Time-consuming
  • Expert personnel and care during transport required
  • Requires withholding of some medications prior to testing 
Histology
  • Highly specific, simple and inexpensive
  • More sensitive than RUT and culture
  • Allows direct visualization of organism and provides information on associated pathology (eg atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, gastric cancer) 
  • Several days for result
  • Nature of tissue involvement
  • With high rate of false-negative results
  • Requires withholding of some medications prior to testing 
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
  • Very good specificity sensitivity
    • Liquid phase (DNA-enzyme immunoassay) and reverse dot blot probe assay (LiPA) increase PCR's specificity and sensitivity
  • Rapid and accurate results
  • Permits determination of antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence typing
  • Expensive
  • Expert personnel and longer time to process required
  • Not widely available