Potent KV7 potassium channel opener shows promise in MDD treatment

06 Jun 2025
Potent KV7 potassium channel opener shows promise in MDD treatment

The KV7 potassium channel opener azetukalner helps improve symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults, according to the results of the proof-of-concept, phase II X-NOVA study.

X-NOVA included 168 adults (mean age 47.2 years, 66.5 percent female) with moderate-to-severe MDD who had a current depressive episode. These participants were randomly assigned to receive treatment with azetukalner at 10 (n=56) or 20 mg (n=56) or placebo for 6 weeks. Treatment was taken orally, once daily with food. Concomitant antidepressant medications were prohibited.

Researchers measured the change from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score at week 6 as the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints were changes in the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) and Beck Anxiety Inventory at week 6. Exploratory endpoints included changes in the 17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) score at week 6 and in MADRS score at week 1. Frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were also documented.

The modified intent-to-treat and safety populations comprised 164 and 167 participants, respectively. At week 6, MADRS score decreased by 16.94 points with azetukalner 20 mg, by 15.61 points with the 10-mg dose, and by 13.90 points with placebo.

The difference in the change in MADRS scores at week 6 between 20 mg of azetukalner and placebo did not reach statistical significance, although it was clinically meaningful (–3.04 points, 95 percent confidence interval [CI], –7.04 to 0.96 points; p=0.14). Meanwhile, the difference in the change in MADRS scores at week 1 between 20 mg of azetukalner and placebo was statistically significant (–2.66 points, 95 percent CI, –5.30 to –0.03 points; p=0.047).

HAM-D17 scores at week 6 dropped with significantly greater magnitude with azetukalner 20 mg vs placebo (–13.3 vs –10.2 points; p=0.04), as were SHAPS scores (–7.77 vs –5.30 points; p=0.046).

In terms of safety, treatment discontinuation due to TEAEs occurred similarly across treatment groups.

JAMA Netw Open 2025;8:e2514278