Adjuvant FOLFIRINOX ups survival in pancreatic cancer

15 Oct 2022
Elaine Soliven
Elaine SolivenMIMS Editor
Elaine Soliven
Elaine Soliven MIMS Editor
Adjuvant FOLFIRINOX ups survival in pancreatic cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy with a modified dose of FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) was associated with significantly better survival outcomes, particularly disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), compared with single-agent gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), according to a 5-year analysis of the PRODIGE 24/Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA6* study.

This multicentre (77 hospitals in France and Canada), open-label, phase III trial involved 493 patients (mean age 62.0 years, 43.8 percent female) with PDAC who underwent complete macroscopic (R0/R1) resection. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX** (n=247) or gemcitabine*** (n=246). [JAMA Oncol 2022;doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.3829]

At a median follow-up of 69.7 months, median DFS was significantly longer among those treated with mFOLFIRINOX compared with gemcitabine (21.4 vs 12.8 months; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.66, 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.54–0.82; p<0.001).

Patients on mFOLFIRINOX also had a significantly longer median OS than those on gemcitabine (53.5 months vs 35.5 months; p=0.001).

“Noticeably, the gain in DFS with treatment with mFOLFIRINOX translate[d] into an OS benefit, with a 32 percent risk reduction in the risk of death compared with the gemcitabine group,” said the researchers.

Five-year DFS and OS rates were higher in the mFOLFIRINOX group vs the gemcitabine group (26.1 percent vs 19.0 percent [DFS] and 43.2 percent vs 31.4 percent [OS]).

In addition, fewer deaths occurred in the mFOLFIRINOX group than the gemcitabine group (44.7 percent vs 55.3 percent).

Significantly prolonged median metastasis-free survival (29.4 vs 17.7 months; stratified HR, 0.64, 95 percent CI, 0.52–0.80; p<0.001) and cancer-specific survival (54.7 vs 36.3 months; stratified HR, 0.65, 95 percent CI, 0.51–0.82; p<0.001) were observed in patients treated with mFOLFIRINOX compared with gemcitabine.

In a multivariable analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX (HR, 0.65; p<0.001), age <70 years (HR, 0.70; p=0.02), well-differentiated tumour grade (HR, 0.69; p=0.01), and tumour stages of IA/IIB, IIA, and IIIB (HRs, 0.10, 0.24, and 0.35, respectively; p=0.002 for all) were factors significantly associated with improved OS.

However, a shorter time from the end of adjuvant therapy to disease relapse was considered an adverse prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.03; p<0.001). Therefore, it is important to facilitate early detection and treatment of relapse, the researchers noted.

No new safety signals were observed with this longer follow-up.

“This final 5-year analysis with mature data … indicates that adjuvant chemotherapy with a mFOLFIRINOX regimen significantly prolonged DFS, OS, metastasis-free survival, and cancer-specific survival compared with treatment with gemcitabine,” said the researchers.

“These findings confirm treatment with mFOLFIRINOX as the recommended adjuvant regimen [following PDAC resection],” they added.

 

*PRODIGE 24/Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA6: Trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus mFOLFIRINOX to treat resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma

**oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², irinotecan 150–180 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², and fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m² every 2 weeks for 12 cycles

***gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for six cycles