IL-23 inhibitor use in a PsA patient with inadequate response to prior bDMARDs

10 Jul 2025
Dr. Iris Tang
Dr. Iris TangSpecialist in Rheumatology; Hong Kong
Dr. Iris Tang
Dr. Iris Tang Specialist in Rheumatology; Hong Kong
IL-23 inhibitor use in a PsA patient with inadequate response to prior bDMARDs

History and presentation
A 29-year-old lady with heavily preĀ­treated psoriatic arthritis (PsA) was reĀ­ferred to our clinic in 2021.

The patient had good past health beĀ­fore her diagnosis of psoriasis in 2010, and was managed with topical steroids. She deĀ­veloped psoriatic arthritis 5 years later with dactylitis, wrist and knee pain and swelling. She was initially given NSAIDS to manage the pain followed by etanercept, a tumour necosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), to which she responded well for 2 years. Blood tests in 2015 found elevated erythrocyte sedimenĀ­tation rate (ESR), but human leukocyte antigen-B27 (HLA-B27) was not detected.

In 2018, she developed secondary failure with joint and rash flare, and was switched to an interleukin (IL)-12/23 inĀ­hibitor, which provided improvement in skin rash only. Methotrexate was added to manage persistent joint symptoms, but was stopped after deterioration of liver function. In October 2019, she was startĀ­ed on an IL-17 inhibitor plus leflunomide, but leflunomide was discontinued due to tolerability issues.

Despite good psoriasis control with IL-17 inhibitor monotherapy, the patient still reported musculoskeletal pain. TreatĀ­ment was switched to golimumab, anĀ­other TNFi in April 2019. However, due to increasing joint pain, treatment was switched back to IL-17 inhibitor monoĀ­therapy, which led to stable disease control until 2023.

In November 2023, she experienced a skin and arthritic flare, likely triggered by medication noncompliance, and could not regain good disease control despite therapy resumption. She developed dacĀ­tylitis in her left ring finger and left fourth toe, and reported increased nonspecific lower back pain (visual analogue scale [VAS] pain score, 60 out of 100) with morning stiffness, joint stiffness, and arĀ­thritis in her right knee and left thumb. Physical examination revealed a swollen right knee, three tender joints and three swollen joints, but no nail changes, enĀ­thesitis or uveitis. She also had increased psoriatic rash. She rated her pain 50 out of 100 on the VAS. Her C-reactive protein (CRP) level was elevated at 2.2 mg/dL (reference range, ≤0.5 mg/dL) and ESR was also elevated at 82 mm/h (reference range, ≤20 mm/h in women). MRI of the whole spine and sacroiliac joint did not reĀ­veal active sacroiliitis or spondylitis.

Treatment with guselkumab and response
As the patient preferred injectable medication over daily oral medications, she was switched to the IL-23 inhibitor, guselkumab (100 mg subcutaneously at weeks 0 and 4, followed by Q8W for maintenance) in February 2024.

The patient responded well to guselĀ­kumab, with no treatment-related side efĀ­fects. In May 2024, 3 months after guselĀ­kumab initiation, both her CRP level and ESR had normalized, and her skin condiĀ­tion improved dramatically. The psoriatic rash over her trunk and limbs had mostly resolved, with very mild hairline psoriasis remaining. The number of tender and swollen joints had reduced from three to one. The patient reported improvements in knee pain and toe dactylitis, but still had some persistent pain and vestigial swelling in her left fourth proximal interĀ­phalangeal (PIP) joint. Musculoskeletal ultrasound revealed synovial hypertrophy with 2+ power doppler signal in the left fourth PIP joint, which was treated with intra-articular steroid.

Last reviewed in November 2024 (9 months after guselkumab initiation), the patient had achieved remission and pain in her joints had largely resolved. CRP level was <0.1 mg/dL.

Discussion
Patients with PsA can have multiĀ­domain involvement, including skin psoĀ­riasis, peripheral arthritis, spondylitis, dactylitis, enthesitis and nail disease. The treatment goal is to achieve lowest level of disease activity across all domains, comĀ­monly referred to as remission or minimal disease activity (MDA), through reguĀ­lar monitoring and appropriate therapy adjustment.1,2

Our patient, who was not well conĀ­trolled with NSAIDs, was intolerant to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), and had inadequate response to multiple biĀ­ological DMARDs (bDMARDs), includĀ­ing TNFi’s, IL-17 and IL-12/23 inhibitors, achieved effective disease control across multiple domains with guselkumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the p19 subunit of IL-23.3

IL-23 plays a pivotal role in PsA pathoĀ­physiology and triggers effector cytokines causing tissue inflammation and injury. Targeting IL-23, particularly with p19 inĀ­hibitors such as guselkumab, is found to be effective and safe for managing mulĀ­tiple clinical PsA domains, most notably the skin, and hence is an appropriate treatment choice for our patient with acĀ­tive skin involvement, pain, peripheral arĀ­thritis and dactylitis.3

In the phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled DISCOVER-1 triĀ­al, use of guselkumab was associated with higher rates of achieving ACR20 and ACR50 responses (ie, ≥20 and ≥50 percent improvement in American ColĀ­lege of Rheumatology [ACR] criteria) and MDA at week 24 vs placebo, and response rates were maintained or inĀ­creased through 52 weeks, regardless of prior TNFi use. Psoriasis Area and SeĀ­verity Index (PASI) score of ≤1 at week 24 was also achieved by a greater proĀ­portion of patients treated with guselĀ­kumab vs placebo.4-7 (Tables 1 and 2)


The phase IIIB, randomized, double-blind COSMOS trial showed that in patients with inadequate response to TNFi, guselkumab provided substantial benefits across multiple domains (swolĀ­len/tender joints, psoriasis, spinal pain, enthesitis/dactylitis) vs placebo, with inĀ­creasing proportions of patients achievĀ­ing LDA/remission over 1 year.8,9

Guselkumab was associated with a higher rate of ≥20 percent improvement in pain VAS at week 24 vs placebo in both the DISCOVER-1 and COSMOS trials.5,9 However, there are no head-to-head trials comparing the efficacy of IL-23 inhibitors vs other therapeutic classĀ­es of bDMARDs.3

Despite active axial symptoms, our patient’s MRI did not reveal any active sacroiliitis. IL-23 inhibition is not routinely recommended in axial PsA since previĀ­ous trials of IL-23 inhibitors in ankylosĀ­ing spondylitis demonstrated a lack of efficacy,1,10 However, in biologic-naïve PsA patients with imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis, guselkumab demonstratĀ­ed durable and meaningful improveĀ­ments in axial symptoms and disease activity in a post-hoc analysis of the DISCOVER-2 trial.11

In this patient with prior inadequate response to multiple bDMARDs of difĀ­ferent classes, guselkumab provided reductions in disease activity in terms of peripheral arthritis, dactylitis and axial pain.

References:

  1. Rheumatology 2022;18:465-479.
  2. Arthritis Care Res 2019;71:2-29.
  3. Musculoskeletal Care 2022;20:S12-S21.
  4. RMD Open 2021;7:e001457.
  5. ACR Open Rheumatol 2023;5:149-164.
  6. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38:727-735.
  7. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:1564-1570.
  8. Rheumatology 2024;doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keae586.
  9. RMD Open 2024;10:e004494.
  10. Front Immunol 2021;12:614255.
  11. Rheumatol Ther 2023;10:1637-1653. 

This article is supported by Johnson & Johnson (Hong Kong) Ltd.
CP-524696 June 2025

Related MIMS Drugs