Content on this page:
Content on this page:
Evaluation
Staging
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and European
Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) developed the TNM System for NETs of all
anatomical sites. There are some differences between these systems,
particularly for primary tumors of the pancreas and appendix, but there is also
a considerable overlap. The staging criteria for both systems depend on the
tumor size and extent of invasion into similar landmarks as used for the
staging of non-neuroendocrine carcinomas of the same sites.
American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Staging of Neuroendocrine
Tumors of the Stomach
Stage I | |
T1 N0 M0 | Tumor invades the mucosa or submucosa and ≤1 cm in size; no regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage II | |
T2 N0 M0 | Tumor invades the muscularis propria or >1 cm in size; no regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
T3 N0 M0 | Tumor invades the muscularis propria into subserosal tissue without penetration of overlying serosa; no regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage III | |
T1 N1 M0 | Tumor invades the mucosa or submucosa and ≤1 cm in size; with regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
T2 N1 M0 | Tumor invades the muscularis propria or >1 cm in size; with regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
T3 N1 M0 | Tumor invades the muscularis propria into subserosal tissue without penetration of overlying serosa; with regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
T4 N0 M0 | Tumor invades visceral peritoneum (serosa) or other organs or adjacent structures; no regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
T4 N1 M0 | Tumor invades visceral peritoneum (serosa) or other organs or adjacent structures; with regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage IV | |
Any T Any N M1 | Tumor of any size or location; with or without regional lymph node metastasis; with distant organ metastasis |
AJCC Staging of NETs of the Pancreas
Stage I | |
T1 N0 M0 | Tumor is still in the pancreas, <2 cm in size; no involved regional lymph node; no distant metastasis |
Stage II | |
T2 N0 M0 | Tumor is still in the pancreas, 2-4 cm in size; no involved regional lymph node; no distant metastasis |
T3 N0 M0 | Tumor is still in the pancreas, >4 cm in size or the tumor invades the duodenum or common bile duct; no involved regional lymph node; no distant metastasis |
Stage III | |
T4 N0 M0 | Tumor invades the adjacent organs (stomach, spleen, colon, adrenal gland) or the wall of large blood vessels (celiac axis or the superior mesenteric artery); no involved regional lymph node; no distant metastasis |
Any T N1 M0 | Any primary tumor size that may or may not have grown outside of the pancreas; with involved regional lymph node; no distant metastasis |
Stage IV | |
Any T Any N M1 | Any primary tumor size that may or may not have grown outside of the pancreas; with involved regional lymph node; with distant metastasis |
AJCC Staging of NETs of the Appendix
Stage I | |
T1 N0 M0 | Tumor ≤2 cm; no regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage II | |
T2 N0 M0 | Tumor 2-4 cm; no regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
T3 N0 M0 | Tumor >4 cm or with subserosal invasion or involvement of the mesoappendix; no regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage III | |
T4 N1 M0 | Tumor perforates the peritoneum or directly invades other adjacent organs or structures (eg abdominal wall, skeletal muscle); with regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Any T N1 M0 |
Tumor of any size that may or may not perforate the peritoneum or directly invades other adjacent organs or structures; with regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage IV | |
Any T Any N M1 | Tumor of any size that may or may not perforate the peritoneum or directly invades other adjacent organs or structures; with or without regional lymph node metastasis; with distant metastases |
AJCC Staging of NETs of the Thymus
Stage I | |
T1a N0 M0 | Tumor encapsulated or extending into the mediastinal fat without mediastinal pleura involvement; no regional lymph node metastasis; no pleural, pericardial or distant metastasis |
T1b N0 M0 | Tumor encapsulated or extending into the mediastinal fat with direct invasion of mediastinal pleura involvement; no regional lymph node metastasis; no pleural, pericardial or distant metastasis |
Stage II | |
T2 N0 M0 | Tumor with direct invasion of mediastinal pleura; no regional lymph node metastasis; no pleural, pericardial or distant metastasis |
Stage IIIA | |
T3 N0 M0 | Tumor with direct invasion into any of the following: Lung, brachiocephalic vein, superior venacava, phrenic nerve, chest wall or extrapericardial pulmonary artery or veins; no regional lymph node metastasis; no pleural, pericardial or distant metastasis |
Stage IIIB | |
T4 N0 M0 | Tumor with invasion into any of the following: Aorta, arch vessels, intrapericardial pulmonary artery, myocardium, trachea, esophagus; no regional lymph node metastasis; no pleural, pericardial or distant metastasis |
Stage IVA | |
Any T N1 M0 | Any tumor that may or may not invade outside the thymus; with metastasis in anterior (perithymic) lymph nodes; no pleural, pericardial or distant metastasis |
Any T N0 M1a | Any tumor that may or may not invade outside the thymus; no regional lymph node metastasis; with separate pleural or pericardial nodules |
Any T N1 M1a | Any tumor that may or may not invade outside the thymus; with metastasis in anterior (perithymic) lymph nodes; with separate pleural or pericardial nodules |
Stage IVB | |
Any T N2 M0 | Any tumor that may or may not invade outside the thymus; with metastasis in deep intrathoracic or cervical lymph nodes; no pleural, pericardial or distant metastasis |
Any T N2 M1a | Any tumor that may or may not invade outside the thymus; with metastasis in deep intrathoracic or cervical lymph nodes; with separate pleural or pericardial nodules |
Any T Any N M1b | Any tumor that may or may not invade outside the thymus; with or without regional lymph node metastasis; with pulmonary intraparenchymal nodule or distant organ metastasis |
AJCC Staging of Well-Differentiated NETs of the Duodenum and Ampulla of Vater
Stage I | |
T1 N0 M0 | Tumor size is ≤1 cm that invades the mucosa or submucosa only or confined within the sphincter of Oddi; no involved regional lymph node; no distant metastases |
Stage II | |
T2 N0 M0 | Tumor size is >1 cm that invades the muscularis propria or sphincter into the duodenal submucosa or muscularis propria; no involved regional lymph node; no distant metastases |
T3 N0 M0 | Tumor invades the pancreas or peripancreatic adipose tissue; no involved regional lymph node; no distant metastases |
Stage III | |
T4 N0 M0 | Tumor invades the visceral peritoneum or other organs; without regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastases |
Any T N1 M0 | Tumor invades the visceral peritoneum or other organs; with regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastases |
Stage IV | |
Any T Any N M1 | Any tumor size that may or may not invade in adjacent organs or structures, with or without regional lymph nodes; with distant metastases |
AJCC Staging of NETs of the Small Intestine (Jejunum/Ileum)
Stage I | |
T1 N0 M0 | Tumor invades lamina propria or submucosa and ≤1 cm; no involved regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage II | |
T2 N0 M0 | Tumor invades muscularis propria or >1 cm; no involved regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
T3 N0 M0 | Tumor invades through the muscularis propria into subserosal tissue without penetration of overlying serosa; no involved regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage III | |
T1 N1 M0 | Tumor invades lamina propria or submucosa and ≤1 cm; with <12 regional lymph node involvement; no distant metastasis |
T1 N2 M0 | Tumor invades lamina propria or submucosa and ≤1 cm; with large mesenteric masses (>2 cm) and/or extensive nodal deposits (≥12), especially those encase the superior mesenteric vessels; no distant metastasis |
T2 N1 M0 | Tumor invades muscularis propria or >1 cm; with <12 regional lymph node involvement; no distant metastasis |
T2 N2 M0 | Tumor invades muscularis propria or >1 cm; with large mesenteric masses (>2 cm) and/or extensive nodaldeposits (≥12), especially those encase the superior mesenteric vessels; no distant metastasis |
T3 N1 M0 | Tumor invades through the muscularis propria into subserosal tissue without penetration of overlying serosa; with <12 regional lymph node involvement; no distant metastasis |
T3 N2 M0 | Tumor invades through the muscularis propria into subserosal tissue without penetration of overlying serosa; with large mesenteric masses (>2 cm) and/or extensive nodal deposits (≥12), especially those encase the superior mesenteric vessels; no distant metastasis |
T4 N0 M0 | Tumor invades visceral peritoneum (serosa) or other organs or adjacent structures; no involved regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
T4 N1 M0 | Tumor invades visceral peritoneum (serosa) or other organs or adjacent structures; with <12 regional lymph node involvement; no distant metastasis |
T4 N2 M0 | Tumor invades visceral peritoneum (serosa) or other organs or adjacent structures; with large mesenteric masses (>2 cm) and/or extensive nodal deposits (≥12), especially those encase the superior mesenteric vessels; no distant metastasis |
Stage IV | |
Any T Any N M1 | Tumor or any size that may or may not invade other organs, visceral peritoneum or adjacent structures; with or without regional lymph node involvement; with distant metastasis |
AJCC Staging of the NETs of Colon or Rectum
Stage I | |
T1 N0 M0 | Tumor invades the mucosa or submucosa and ≤2 cm; no regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage IIA | |
T2 N0 M0 | Tumor invades the muscularis propria or >2 cm with invasion of the lamina propria or submucosa; no regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage IIB | |
T3 N0 M0 | Tumor invades through the muscularis propria into subserosal tissue without penetration of overlying serosa; no regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage IIIA | |
T4 N0 M0 | Tumor invades the visceral peritoneum (serosa) or other organs or adjacent structures; no regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage IIIB | |
Any T N1 M0 | Any tumor size that may or may not invade the visceral peritoneum (serosa), other organs or adjacent structures, with regional lymph node metastasis; with no distant metastasis |
T4 N1 M0 | Tumor invades the visceral peritoneum (serosa), other organs or adjacent structures; with regional lymph node metastasis; no distant metastasis |
Stage IV | |
Any T Any N M1 | Any tumor size that may or may not invade the visceral peritoneum (serosa), other organs o radjacent structures, with or without regional lymph node metastasis; with distant metastasis |
Reference: National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Neuroendocrine tumors and adrenal tumors. Version 2.2024.
Principles of Therapy
The management of neuroendocrine tumors depends on tumor size and
primary site as well as the general condition of the patient. The therapeutic
management should be based on proliferative activity, SSTR expression, tumor
growth rate and extent of disease. The optimal therapy by a multidisciplinary
team should include surgical and medical treatment modalities.
Goals of Therapy
The goals of therapy are to increase survival, for symptom, biochemical
and tumor control and to improve quality of life.
Pharmacological therapy
Somatostatin Analogs
Example drugs: Octreotide, Lanreotide
Somatostatin analogs bind selectively to SSTRs to block the release of
bioactive peptides and amines. These are the drug of choice in patients with
symptomatic functional gastroenterohepatic NETs to decrease hormone production,
control symptoms and minimize the risk of carcinoid crises. These are first-line
agents for functional NETs and low- to intermediate-grade small intestinal
carcinoids. The recommended therapy for locoregional unresectable and
metastatic carcinoid tumors with asymptomatic, low to clinically significant
tumor burden and carcinoid syndrome. Somatostatin analogs are the mainstay for
the control and relief of symptoms in carcinoid syndrome by decreasing or
normalizing 5-HIAA levels. These prevent carcinoid crisis during procedures
such as surgery or hepatic arterial infusions; thus, Octreotide is given
perioperatively and intraoperatively. These improve time to progression among
patients with metastatic, well-differentiated, midgut NETs and should be an
alternative for tumor stabilization in patients with or without carcinoid
syndrome. Their use should also be considered in all patients with elevated
5-HIAA levels even if asymptomatic because increased 5-HIAA is a predictor of
cardiac complications and a marker of tumor growth or progression. Somatostatin
analogs decrease circulating serotonin levels and may stabilize progression of
carcinoid heart disease.
Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) is recommended in patients with
non-functional tumors and is an alternative in patients with metastatic
colorectal NETs, especially in cases where radiotracer uptake on octreoscan
indicates SSTR expression. This is used for chronic management of symptomatic
patients with carcinoid syndrome. This prevents proliferation in functioning and
non-functioning small intestinal carcinoids. In long-term therapy of some NETs
(eg glucagonomas, somatostatinomas), they may cause symptomatic breakthrough,
in which increased dose, more frequent administration, shortened interval, or
temporarily discontinuation is needed.
Lanreotide or Octreotide LAR are options for patients with
locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic NETs of the gastrointestinal tract. These
may also be used in patients with distant metastases from NETs of the lung or
thymus. These may be considered in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or
metastatic neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors. These are first-line management
for symptom control in glucagonomas and VIPomas in addition to correction of electrolyte
imbalance prior to surgery. These may be used in patients with gastrinoma to
manage gastric hypersecretion with high-dose PPIs. These should be used with
caution in patients with insulinomas that do not express SSTR because they may
worsen hypoglycemia.
Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Inhibitors
Example drugs: Everolimus, Rapamycin
Mammalian target of rapamycin is a conserved serine/threonine kinase
regulating cell growth and metabolism in response to environmental factors and
signaling downstream of receptor tyrosine kinases, which includes insulin-like
growth factor receptor, VEGF receptor, and epidermal growth factor. This may
control hypoglycemia in patients with metastatic insulinomas. Everolimus is
used in patients with advanced carcinoid and malignant pancreatic NETs and for
advanced NETs of the gastrointestinal tract, lungs and thymus. Everolimus is
also used in patients with symptoms and unresectable neuroendocrine pancreatic and
carcinoid tumors that initially present with clinically significant disease
progression. Everolimus is recommended for patients with locoregionally
advanced and/or metastatic NETs of the gastrointestinal tract.

Kinase Inhibitors
Example drug: Sunitinib
Studies have shown that they may have modest antitumor activity in metastatic gastric and pancreatic NETs. These are used in patients with symptoms and unresectable neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors that initially present with clinically significant disease progression. Sunitinib may be used in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors.
Interferon (IFN) alpha
Interferons, IFN-alpha2, and IFN-alpha2b bind to specific interferon receptors on neuroendocrine cells activating signal transduction cascade which leads to transcription of multiple tumor suppressor genes. These inhibit protein and hormone synthesis in tumor cells, inhibit angiogenesis, and stimulate the immune system. These can control symptoms and induce disease stabilization, which leads to an objective response. These can be utilized for low-proliferating NETs, either as monotherapy or in combination with somatostatin analogs. The combination regimen can enhance antitumor activity. This is considered in patients with locoregional unresectable disease and/or metastatic carcinoid NETs who are refractory to somatostatin analogs and those with progressive disease. IFN-alpha is a treatment option for patients with progressive metastatic lung NETs especially if with carcinoid syndrome. IFN-alpha2b can be considered in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic NETs of the gastrointestinal tract. This is effective in controlling symptoms in patients with carcinoid syndrome who may be resistant to somatostatin analogs. This requires careful monitoring because of common adverse effects.

Hypoxia-inducible Factor 2 Alpha (HIF-2α) Inhibitor
Example drug: Belzutifan
Hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha (HIF-2α) inhibitor binds to HIF-2α, blocking the HIF-2α-HIF-1β interaction in conditions of hypoxia or tumor suppressor protein impairment, leading to reduced transcription and expression of HIF-2α target genes. This is considered for patients with progressive pancreatic NETs with germline VHL alteration.
Immunotherapy
Example drugs: Nivolumab/Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab
Nivolumab/Ipilimumab may be used in patients with metastatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma if with progression. Pembrolizumab may be considered in patients with locoregional unresectable or metastatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma if with mismatch repair-deficient), microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or advanced mutational burden high that has progressed and no satisfactory alternative treatment is available.

Chemotherapy
Cytotoxic chemotherapy is used for tumors with high proliferative capacity (Ki67 >5%). There are effective chemotherapeutic agents with sufficient antitumor activity that can be used as monotherapy or as a combination regimen. This should only be used when it will most likely have an effect so as to minimize or avoid its toxic side effects. This is considered only in patients with clinically advanced aggressive tumors who have no other treatment options. The benefits associated with chemotherapy in patients with advanced NETs are modest at best as tumor response rates are generally low with no clearly demonstrated benefit. This may decrease the proliferative capacity of highly proliferative disease and improve the efficacy of other treatment options such as surgery, hepatic arterial infusion, somatostatin analog, interferon alpha, or radioisotope therapy.
Monotherapy
5-Fluorouracil, Streptozocin or Doxorubicin
Monotherapy with 5-Fluorouracil, Streptozocin, or Doxorubicin has only modest response rates in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors. Monotherapy with 5-Fluorouracil or Streptozocin can be considered in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic NETs of the gastrointestinal tract. 5-Fluorouracil may be used at radiosensitizing doses for thymic carcinoid tumors after surgery and for metastatic carcinoid tumors.
Capecitabine
Capecitabine may be used at radiosensitizing doses for thymic carcinoid tumors after surgery, and for metastatic carcinoid tumors. This may be considered in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic NETs of the gastrointestinal tract.
Cisplatin or Carboplatin
Cisplatin or Carboplatin may be used after surgery in patients with atypical or poorly differentiated thymic carcinoid tumors.
Dacarbazine
Dacarbazine can be an option to Streptozocin-based therapy in carcinoid and pancreatic NETs but toxicity limits its use. Dacarbazine-based treatment can also be considered in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic NETs of the gastrointestinal tract and patients with lung NETs.
Oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin may be considered in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic NETs of the gastrointestinal tract.
Temozolomide
Commonly used as monotherapy or in combination with Capecitabine, Temozolomide is a promising agent for pancreatic NETs. Either regimen is acceptable since there are no studies that compare the efficacy of Temozolomide monotherapy to combination therapy. This may also be considered as a treatment option for metastatic or unresectable thymic/lung NETs. This can be considered in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic NETs of the gastrointestinal tract.

Combination Therapy
Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin (CAPEOX)
Studies have shown good response rates (23-30%) in patients with poorly differentiated NETs and well-differentiated disease. This may be an option in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors.
Carboplatin/Etoposide
Carboplatin/Etoposide is recommended as first-line treatment in metastatic disease. This is also used in patients with local-regional or locoregional extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, particularly if surgical resection is difficult. This is considered primary therapy for patients with lung or thymus NETs with intermediate-grade/atypical tumors with Ki67 proliferative index and mitotic index in the higher end of the defined spectrum. This may be considered in distant metastases from NETs of the lungs or thymus.
Carboplatin/Irinotecan
Carboplatin/Irinotecan may be used in patients with locoregional and metastatic extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, particularly if surgical resection is difficult.
Cisplatin/Etoposide or Its Analog
Cisplatin/Etoposide or its analog has a good response rate but a short response duration and a poor prognosis of 2-year survival rate of <20% in patients with poorly differentiated pancreatic NETs. This is considered as primary therapy for patients with lung or thymus NETs with intermediate-grade/atypical tumors with Ki67 proliferative index and mitotic index in the higher end of the defined spectrum. This is recommended as first-line therapy for metastatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. This is considered in patients with local-regional extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, especially when there is difficult surgical resection.
Cisplatin/Irinotecan
Cisplatin/Irinotecan may be used in patients with locoregional and metastatic extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, particularly if surgical resection is difficult.
Cyclophosphamide/Vincristine/Dacarbazine
Cyclophosphamide/Vincristine/Dacarbazine responses are usually short and in only a few of the patients. This is preferred in patients with negative MIBG scintigraphy and those with rapidly progressive tumors.
Leucovorin/Fluorouracil/Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)
Leucovorin/Fluorouracil/Oxaliplatin may be an option in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors. This is also used in patients with locoregional and metastatic extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, particularly if surgical resection is difficult.
Leucovorin/Fluorouracil/Irinotecan (FOLFIRI)
Leucovorin/Fluorouracil/Irinotecan may be used in patients with resectable, locoregional unresectable and metastatic extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.
Leucovorin/Fluorouracil/Irinotecan/Oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX)
Leucovorin/Fluorouracil/Irinotecan/Oxaliplatin may be used in patients with resectable, locoregional unresectable and metastatic extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.
Streptozocin/Doxorubicin, Streptozocin/Fluorouracil, Streptozocin/Doxorubicin/Fluorouracil
Streptozocin/Doxorubicin, Streptozocin/Fluorouracil, or Streptozocin/Doxorubicin/Fluorouracil are the most effective and commonly used combination therapies in well-differentiated pancreatic NETs. These may be an option in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors. Streptozocin/Doxorubicin/Fluorouracil regimen showed a good overall response rate and median survival of 37 months in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic NETs. Streptozocin-based treatment may be considered in patients with metastatic gastric NETs. Studies with combination therapy in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors have not shown superiority to monotherapy and are associated with significant toxicity. These may be considered in distant metastases from NETs of the lung or thymus.
Temozolomide/Capecitabine, Temozolomide/Thalidomide, Temozolomide/Everolimus
Temozolomide/Capecitabine, Temozolomide/Thalidomide, or Temozolomide/Everolimus showed beneficial results. Temozolomide-based treatment may be considered in patients with metastatic gastric NETs and an acceptable alternative to Streptomycin-based therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. These may be considered in patients with metastatic large- or small-cell lung cancer. These may also be considered in patients with distant metastases from NETs of the lung or thymus. These may be used in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors, and locoregional and metastatic extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, particularly if surgical resection is difficult. These may have more activity against tumors arising in the pancreas compared to other NETs.
Surgery
Surgical management should be individualized, with the ultimate
therapeutic decisions and approaches decided after a full multidisciplinary
evaluation. Surgery can be curative (primary tumor resection) or palliative
(tumor cytoreduction). This has curative potential and can improve survival. It
can lessen or remove the risk of progressive symptoms such as bowel obstruction.
Early intervention can also increase the chance of successful surgery and
decrease technical complications.
Definitive resection of the primary tumor should always be performed
whenever it is technically feasible. It is the primary treatment approach for
most localized carcinoid tumors and pancreatic NETs. Primary tumor removal by
segmental resection and lymphadenectomy are recommended. Most patients with
advanced metastatic gastrointestinal NETs will have liver metastasis.
Prophylactic cholecystectomy is also advised in patients undergoing surgery for
NETs of the digestive tract in order to mitigate biliary toxicity of
somatostatin analogs and prevent chemical cholecystitis if transcatheter arterial
chemoembolization is done. Octreotide should be given preoperatively and
intraoperatively to avoid intraoperative carcinoid crisis in patients with
functional tumors. Trivalent vaccines (ie H influenzae B, meningococcal
group C, pneumococcus) should be given preoperatively to patients who will
require splenectomy.
Curative
Surgery
Resection
of the primary tumor should be accompanied by a thorough intraoperative
evaluation for synchronous tumors or metastatic disease. Resectable liver
metastasis should be removed. Selective portal vein embolization is considered
in patients with borderline liver reserve in order to induce liver hypertrophy.
Liver
transplantation is an option in young patients <50 years old if:
- Primary tumor originates from the gastrointestinal tract
- Tumor is drained by the venous portal system
- Disease progression is controlled for at least 6 months before transplantation
Palliative
Surgery
Cytoreductive
surgery is recommended in patients when complete resection of the tumor is not
possible. This consists of a combination of multiple techniques such as
hepatectomy, local ablative therapies (eg radiofrequency ablation, cryotherapy,
microwave therapy), intra-abdominal organ resection and bypass procedures. This
aims to stabilize or improve symptoms and decrease or normalize hormone levels.
This can reduce tumor bulk, prevent or delay complications from local or
distant disease, decrease hormone levels, and prolong survival. This requires
the assessment by a multidisciplinary team to ensure care and provide
case-specific palliative options. Hepatic arterial embolization (eg bland
transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, radioembolization) with or
without chemotherapy is another cytoreductive option for patients who are not
surgical candidates, especially for patients with unresectable, metastatic
liver-dominant, well-differentiated NETs. This is indicated for patients
symptomatic or with disease progression on somatostatin analog therapy or other
forms of systemic therapy, or those with bulky hepatic disease.

Localized Neuroendocrine Tumors
Appendix
Most appendiceal carcinoids are found incidentally after an appendectomy and the majority are located at the tip of the appendix. Careful pathological investigation of the specimen is required. Simple appendectomy is considered sufficient treatment since metastasis is uncommon. No surveillance is indicated for tumors <1 cm while optional surveillance every 2-5 years based on pathologic features can be done for tumors ≤1 to ≥2 cm. Completely excised, small, well-differentiated carcinoid measuring ≥1 cm and confined to the tip of the appendix can be considered as cured if there is no evidence of lymphovascular invasion or invasion into the mesoappendix. Patients with tumors >2 cm or any size with incomplete resection or positive node margins should undergo further evaluation (ie multiphasic abdominal/pelvic CT or MRI). Right hemicolectomy should be considered for patients with 1-2 cm tumors with poor prognostic features.
Lung
Lobectomy or other anatomic pulmonary resection (eg segmentectomy, bilobectomy, pneumonectomy) with lymph node resection/sampling is recommended for localized or locoregional resectable disease.
Please see Lung Cancer disease management chart for further information.
Cecum
Carcinoids of the cecum are frequently metastatic at the time of diagnosis. This is usually present as silent, large, bulky tumors manifesting with gastrointestinal hemorrhage or obstruction. This is more aggressive than appendiceal carcinoid. Surgical excision with adequate resection of mesenteric lymph-node bearing tissue is recommended. A careful pathological examination is required especially in small lesions.
Duodenum
For non-metastatic duodenal carcinoid tumors (ie non-functioning NETs, duodenal gastrinoma), if feasible, endoscopic resection is recommended and if performed, follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy is done as indicated.
Other options include:
- Transduodenal local excision with regional lymphadenectomy
- Pancreatoduodenectomy: May also be considered for rare ampullary tumors not amenable to local or endoscopic excision
Jejunum/Ileum/Colon
Bowel
resection with regional lymphadenectomy is recommended. Manual palpation of the
entire bowel is done to assess the presence of synchronous tumors. An intra-operative
assessment of the superior mesenteric artery and vein is also recommended.
Well-differentiated colonic NETs have the worst prognosis among NETs arising
from the gastrointestinal tract.
Pancreas
Local
resection (distal pancreatectomy/splenectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy) or
enucleation of pancreatic NETs is recommended whenever feasible. Observation
can be considered for small (≤1 cm), low-grade, non-functional tumors. Lymph
node resection should be considered because of the high risk of metastasis. The
cure rates of other pancreatic NETs are lower because they are diagnosed during
advanced disease states.
Rectum
For small (<1 cm) incidental lesions, complete endoscopic resection with
negative margins may be sufficient. Indeterminate margins may warrant endoscopy
after 6-12 months to assess residual disease. It is recommended to have
endoscopic or transanal excision in tumors ≤2 cm. For tumors 1-2 cm, consider
radical resection if with tumor invasion in muscularis propria or node positive.
A low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection is recommended for
tumors >2 cm with tumor invasion of the muscularis propria or tumors
associated with lymph node metastases.
Stomach
For
early-stage, smaller tumors, endoscopic or wedge resection can be considered if
there is no evidence of regional lymphadenopathy. Endoscopic resection should
be reserved for small (<1 cm), superficial, low-grade tumors. Endoscopic
resection is recommended for patients with locoregional type 1 (atrophic
gastritis or high gastric pH) and 2 (Zollinger-Ellison; no atrophic gastritis,
low gastric pH) gastric NETs. Radical resection with regional lymphadenectomy
should be done to patients with non-metastatic gastric NETs with normal gastrin
levels (type 3) because of its more aggressive quality.
Thymus
Thymus
NETs are generally treated with surgical resection (thymectomy via median
sternotomy and/or thoracotomy with lymph node dissection) without adjuvant
therapy for localized and resectable disease with negative margins.
Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
For metastatic NETs of the gastrointestinal tract, when possible,
surgical cytoreduction (ie resection of primary tumor + regional lymph nodes +
metastasis) is done followed by surveillance and pharmacological treatment. If
surgical cytoreduction is not possible, surveillance and pharmacological
treatment can be started if the tumor burden is low, but if there is
significant tumor burden, primary tumor resection should still be considered.
Given that the liver is a common site of metastasis for NETs, liver-directed
therapy (ie surgical resection, hepatic arterial embolization [including bland
transarterial embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial
radioembolization], percutaneous thermal ablation and radiotherapy) is also
used for the treatment of metastasis.
Pancreas
Pancreatic
neuroendocrine tumors have highly variable growth patterns. Almost all
insulinomas are benign while more than half of other symptomatic pancreatic
NETs and non-functional pancreatic NETs have hepatic metastasis. A high 5-year
survival rates are noted in patients with resected pancreatic NETs, with
incomplete resections and with diffuse hepatic disease. Surgical resection of
all visible tumor is only feasible in a few number of patients with pancreatic
NETs with liver metastasis. Studies showed no evidence of symptom control or
prolonged survival. Despite this, surgical resection should still be attempted
because of the low efficacies of other tumor treatments.
Hepatic
arterial embolization is also recommended in patients with pancreatic NETs with
hepatic metastasis who are not surgical candidates, with disease limited to the
liver with patent portal vein and preserved functional status. Similar response
rates of more than half are also observed with gastric and carcinoid tumors. This
is especially considered in patients with functional pancreatic NETs in which
the hormone excess state cannot be controlled by other treatment modalities. Radiofrequency
ablation and cryoablation, with or without cytoreductive surgery, via
percutaneous or laparoscopic approach are considered in selected patients with
advanced pancreatic NETs.
Stomach
Hepatic
resection provides long-term symptomatic relief and prolongs survival in
patients with hepatic metastasis localized to one lobe. Orthotopic liver
transplantation is only attempted in a small number of patients. There is a
5-year survival rate if there are poor prognostic factors such as prior
extensive upper abdominal surgery, neuroendocrine primary tumor in the duodenum
or pancreas, and hepatomegaly. There is an increased 5-year survival rate in
the absence of risk factors. Thus, liver transplantation cannot be routinely
performed in patients with liver-isolated metastatic NETs but it can be an
option for some young patients without risk factors.
Hepatic
arterial embolization is recommended as a palliative option in patients with
liver metastasis who cannot undergo surgical resection but have preserved
performance status, and disease confined to the liver with a patent portal vein.
This is considered in patients with functional carcinoid tumors in which
hormone excess cannot be controlled by other methods. The response rates are
decreased hormonal secretion or radiographic regression by half. The techniques
used are bland embolization, chemoembolization, embolization with chemotherapy
beads, and embolization using radioisotopes. Radiofrequency ablation and
cryoablation, used alone or in combination with surgical cytoreduction, should
be considered only in selected patients. The clinical benefit is not clearly
established in patients with asymptomatic small-volume disease and may not be applicable
in patients with large-volume liver metastatic disease. For distant metastasis
of the gastrointestinal tract, resection of the primary tumor, regional lymph
nodes, and metastasis is recommended. In cases where cytoreduction of
metastasis is not possible, resection of the primary tumor and/or treatment with
Octreotide or Lanreotide is recommended.
Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
For
patients with pancreatic NETs or malignant-appearing non-functional and
functional pancreatic NETs >2 cm in size, resection should include total
removal of the tumor with negative margins and regional lymph nodes.
Gastrinomas
Exploratory
surgery, including duodenotomy and intraoperative ultrasound with enucleation
or local resection of tumors and removal of periduodenal nodes, is recommended.
Pancreatoduodenectomy is recommended for invasive/deep gastrinomas located
within the head of the pancreas or proximal to the main pancreatic duct. Distal
pancreatectomy with splenectomy with removal of regional nodes may be
considered for distal tumors.
Insulinomas
Enucleation
is the primary treatment for exophytic insulinomas as they are primarily benign.
Peripheral insulinomas may have an open or laparoscopic enucleation/local
resection or spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. If enucleation is not
possible because of deeper or invasive tumors and those in proximity to the
main pancreatic duct, options include:
- Pancreatoduodenectomy for tumors in the head of the pancreas
- Distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen for small tumors not involving the splenic vessels
All
insulinomas regardless of size should undergo resection due to hypoglycemic
complications. Surgical cure rates are high for insulinomas and for sporadic
gastrinomas.
Glucagonomas
Glucagonomas
are mostly malignant, calcified and located in the tail of the pancreas. Distal
pancreatectomy with resection of the peripancreatic lymph nodes and splenectomy
is recommended. Enucleation or local excision with peripancreatic
lymphadenectomy may be considered for peripheral tumors <2 cm. Pancreatoduodenectomy
with peripancreatic lymphadenectomy may be done for tumors in the head of the pancreas
(rare). Perioperative anticoagulation should be considered due to increased
risk of pulmonary emboli.
VIPomas
Enucleation
or local excision with peripancreatic lymph node dissection may be considered
in peripheral tumors <2 cm. Distal pancreatectomy with resection of the
peripancreatic lymph nodes with or without splenectomy is recommended.
Pancreatoduodenectomy with peripancreatic lymph node dissection is suggested
for tumors within the head.
Non-functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Surgical
resection is recommended except in:
- Patients with other life-limiting comorbidities
- High surgical risk
- Widely metastatic disease
Observation can be considered for small (≤2 cm), low-grade, incidentally discovered, non-functional tumors. For non-functional tumors >1 to ≤2 cm in size, patients may have an open or laparoscopic enucleation/local resection (pancreatectomy) with or without regional lymphadenectomy. For patients who have non-functional pancreatic NETs that are 1-2 cm in size with a small but measurable risk of having lymph node metastases, lymph node resection is considered, and serial imaging is recommended. For patients with >2 cm in size pancreatic NETs or malignant-appearing non-functional and functional pancreatic NETs, resection should include total removal of the tumor with negative margins and regional lymph nodes. If the head of the pancreas is involved, may do pancreatoduodenectomy with regional lymphadenectomy. If the distal part of the pancreas is involved, may do distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and regional lymphadenectomy.
Radiation Therapy
Radioisotope Therapy
Peptide
Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) or Radioisotope Therapy
Peptide
receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) or radioisotope therapy can be considered
in both functional and non-functional NETs with a positive SSTR scintigraphy
regardless of the site of the primary tumor. This is a recommended treatment
for NETs of the small intestine (if SSTR positive and with progression on
Octreotide LAR/Lanreotide). Lutetium 177Lu-dotatate is a
radiolabeled somatostatin analog used as PRRT. This is approved for the
treatment of SSTR-positive gastroenteropancreatic NETs, including foregut,
midgut and hindgut. This is an option for patients with locoregionally advanced
and/or metastatic NETs of the gastrointestinal tract. This may be used in
patients with distant metastases from SSTR-positive NETs of the lung or thymus with
disease progression on somatostatin analogs. This may also be considered in
patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic neuroendocrine
pancreatic tumors.
Tumor-targeted
treatment with radioactive Octreotide derivatives 111In-D-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide
(111In-DOTAoctreotide) or 90Y-DOTA-octreotide and 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate
and with 131I-MIBG are associated with varied response rates and
clinical benefit. Patients with malignant NETs treated with [177Lu-DOTA-Tyr3]-octreotide
found a complete response in 2% of patients, a partial response in 32% of
patients, and stabilization in 34% of patients. Radiolabeled somatostatin
analogs may also be considered for advanced pancreatic NETs.

Radiation Therapy
The use of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) should be made in a multidisciplinary manner, considering patient factors, disease site/stage and other therapeutic options. EBRT has limited value in NETs. This is a palliative option in patients with local disease when surgery is not feasible. This is reserved for cases of known residual disease in which complete surgical resection is not possible. This often results in scarring and fibrosis which may interfere with tumor evaluation and make future surgical interventions difficult and potentially dangerous. This causes loss of SSTRs on tumor cell surfaces which decreases the effectiveness of somatostatin analogs. EBRT is generally not used in locoregional NETs of the small bowel, appendix, or colon (including mesenteric disease), due to the risk of bowel injury.
Radiotherapy is only recommended for bone and brain metastases. This is used to treat some bone lesions from malignant pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma, especially those that are rapidly growing. This is effective in the treatment of pain from bone metastasis. Prophylactic cranial irradiation is considered in patients with small-cell lung cancer with successfully treated limited-stage disease and in patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas of the head, neck or unknown primary site. This is recommended for thymic carcinoid tumors after surgery. Radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy may be considered in intermediate-grade (atypical carcinoid) thymic tumors.
Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) can be a treatment option for patients with NETs that have metastasized to the liver. In SIRT, microspheres containing sources of radiation are infused into the hepatic artery and carried by blood flow to the vessels that supply the tumor with minimal damage to healthy liver tissues which are mainly supplied by the portal vein.