Social media posts show difficulties faced by sarcoma patients

a day ago
Doctor-Patient relationship in the era of social mediaDoctor-Patient relationship in the era of social media

An analysis of social media posts reveals the interconnected challenges that patients with sarcoma have to go through, including treatment decisions, financial concerns, and work impact.

A systematic thematic analysis was conducted on a total of 5,466 posts across seven health-related subreddits using a framework of six major categories, namely physical symptoms, disease status, treatments, psychosocial impact, support systems, and daily life impact.

The authors identified themes using regular expression matching across 27 subthemes and performed VADER sentiment analysis to assess emotional valence. A statistical analysis was performed to explore theme co-occurrences using Fisher exact tests and sentiment patterns using Mann-Whitney U tests.

Social media discourse was dominated by treatment-related discussions, with chemotherapy (65.6 percent) and radiation therapy (60.2 percent) showing robust associations with work-related impacts (odds ratio [OR], 2.85 and 2.47, respectively; p<0.001 for all). User engagement was highest in financial discussions and work-related posts.

Disease progression was a critical transition point, which showed strong associations with treatment modalities (chemotherapy: OR, 3.12; radiation: OR, 4.09), anxiety (OR, 2.23), and uncertainty (OR, 2.13). A positive association was also observed between support-seeking behaviour and medical team interactions (OR, 2.16).

In addition, physical symptoms displayed negative sentiments, specifically discussions of weakness (–0.589) and breathing difficulties (–0.308). On the other hand, hope-related discussions exhibited a more positive sentiment than other psychosocial themes (Cohen d, –0.595; p<0.001).

“Integrated support interventions that address both clinical and practical challenges—particularly treatment transitions and financial toxicity—may improve patient care,” the authors said.

Am J Clin Oncol 2025;48:351-356